<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Banks, welcome to the &#8220;assorted services&#8221; category</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnryanblog.com/2009/08/welcome-to-the-assorted-services-category/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnryanblog.com/2009/08/welcome-to-the-assorted-services-category/</link>
	<description>MUSINGS ON MARKETING &#38; MESSAGING IN THE BRANCH</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 07:12:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeffry Pilcher</title>
		<link>http://www.johnryanblog.com/2009/08/welcome-to-the-assorted-services-category/comment-page-1/#comment-3047</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffry Pilcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 01:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnryanblog.com/?p=937#comment-3047</guid>
		<description>I suppose you could replace &quot;never&quot; with &quot;don&#039;t want to.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose you could replace &#8220;never&#8221; with &#8220;don&#8217;t want to.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffry Pilcher</title>
		<link>http://www.johnryanblog.com/2009/08/welcome-to-the-assorted-services-category/comment-page-1/#comment-3041</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffry Pilcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnryanblog.com/?p=937#comment-3041</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think you can improve banking&#039;s &quot;sexy-quotient.&quot; It forces financial institutions to stray way too far outside their comfort zone.

I think consumers put banking on the same plane as toilet paper. They need it, but they will never &quot;engage&quot; with it. For most of us -- as consumers -- I think the goal is to get the &quot;amount of time thinking about banking&quot; down to zero.

What&#039;s fascinating about this is the tension in objectives: financial marketers want to &quot;build relationships,&quot; &quot;foster engagement&quot; and get people to interact more with their brands... while financial consumers want just the opposite. They&#039;d prefer to get a divorce, not &quot;build a relationship.&quot; But, alas, it&#039;s a marriage of convenience and necessity.

As I tweeted a few weeks ago, &quot;How can financial institutions expect to &#039;build relationships&#039; when people try to spend as little time banking as possible?&quot;

Financial institutions want to foist something on consumers that consumers don&#039;t want. Banking is a chore. A commodity. It&#039;s like having to go to the gas station or dry cleaners. No one would do it if they didn&#039;t have to. Inasmuch, please, Mr. Banker or Mrs. Credit Union, just address my immediate needs with knowledgeable staff and efficient service. If you&#039;re &quot;friendly&quot; and &quot;personal&quot; while you&#039;re at it, great, but those aren&#039;t deal-breakers. Basically, just get out of my way as quickly as you can. Everyone&#039;s got better things to do than banking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you can improve banking&#8217;s &#8220;sexy-quotient.&#8221; It forces financial institutions to stray way too far outside their comfort zone.</p>
<p>I think consumers put banking on the same plane as toilet paper. They need it, but they will never &#8220;engage&#8221; with it. For most of us &#8212; as consumers &#8212; I think the goal is to get the &#8220;amount of time thinking about banking&#8221; down to zero.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s fascinating about this is the tension in objectives: financial marketers want to &#8220;build relationships,&#8221; &#8220;foster engagement&#8221; and get people to interact more with their brands&#8230; while financial consumers want just the opposite. They&#8217;d prefer to get a divorce, not &#8220;build a relationship.&#8221; But, alas, it&#8217;s a marriage of convenience and necessity.</p>
<p>As I tweeted a few weeks ago, &#8220;How can financial institutions expect to &#8216;build relationships&#8217; when people try to spend as little time banking as possible?&#8221;</p>
<p>Financial institutions want to foist something on consumers that consumers don&#8217;t want. Banking is a chore. A commodity. It&#8217;s like having to go to the gas station or dry cleaners. No one would do it if they didn&#8217;t have to. Inasmuch, please, Mr. Banker or Mrs. Credit Union, just address my immediate needs with knowledgeable staff and efficient service. If you&#8217;re &#8220;friendly&#8221; and &#8220;personal&#8221; while you&#8217;re at it, great, but those aren&#8217;t deal-breakers. Basically, just get out of my way as quickly as you can. Everyone&#8217;s got better things to do than banking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
